HNB protiv medijskog senzacionalizma

također, svi bi samo pričali o seksu i sl.

ovo o centralnim bankama i falsificiranju financijskih bilanci sam pročitala ranije. sutra je novi dan....... i potrudit ću se proučiti bolje i odgovoriti...
čituckala sam Forda... strava.

Better Grave,Then Slave ?
(odlično!)

pogledala sam neke (Pentagon Strike, War Corporation: The New Fascism)...
izuzetno zanimljivo, ne znam kako si to pronašao.
i inače sam antiglobalista, i sve anti- što nam serviraju iz "centara moći", što ovi video uradci samo potvrđuju i fino kronološki pokazuju kako se sve razvijalo i razvija.

i potrudit ću se proučiti bolje i odgovoriti...

sta je to seigniorage ?
pretpostavimo da vam treba fotokopija novcanice od 100 dolara.
prodavac vam umjesto cijene od par centi naplati cijenu od 100 dolara.

sta je to seigniorage ?
pretpostavimo da nogometni klub istra mora u puli odigrati utakmicu protiv real madrida.predsjednik kluba ode i naruci masu novostampanih ulaznica.stampar mu umjesto par sto kuna za stampanje,naplati cijelokupni iznos svih ulaznica po cijeni koja pise na njihovom nalicju !!!

a ovo su posljedice:

The Undeclared War on America's Middle Class

They promise the American Dream: A home of your own -- with ultra-low rates and payments anyone can afford. Now, the trap has sprung
Nightmare Mortgages

Takozvane "posljedice" su izgovor lijenih ili neucenih manjina kojima je lakse izvrsavati veliku nuzdu po danasnjoj vladi i financijskim institucijama (lokacija i politicko opredjeljenje nije vazno) umjesto prihvatiti pojam da svi mi imamo pravo izbora.

Takozvane "posljedice" su izgovor lijenih ili neucenih manjina kojima je lakse izvrsavati veliku nuzdu po danasnjoj vladi i financijskim institucijama (lokacija i politicko opredjeljenje nije vazno) umjesto prihvatiti pojam da svi mi imamo pravo izbora.

takozvane lijene manjine sacinjavaju veliku vecinu danasnjih 6 milijardi zemljana.
nazalost,vecina je te " manjine" zbilja neucena;sada na svu srecu puno manje nego jucer.
zivimo u vremenu u kojemu je najskuplja stvar informacija,a ne znanje.
najpametniji covjek na svijetu ispada ovca bez prave informacije;gledaj slucajnosti,do sada je pravih financijskih informacija "manjkalo".





iluziju o slobodnom izboru danas pjevaju vec i vrapci na granama.



ciao

kantautor je napisao/la: › sta je to seigniorage ?

ili jednostavno emisijska zarada, mada ima talenata koji su u stanju i izgubiti

@fatcat,
nisu financijske institucije baš tako dobre....... npr. ne plasiraju sredstva zemljama trećeg svijeta za točno određene namjene jer im nešto silno žele pomoći. da bi nekoga kontrolirao, postoje različiti načini, instrumeni, koji su se kroz povijest mijenjali.......

kantautor je napisao/la: › takozvane lijene manjine sacinjavaju veliku vecinu danasnjih 6 milijardi zemljana. nazalost,vecina je te " manjine" zbilja neucena;sada na svu srecu puno manje nego jucer. zivimo u vremenu u kojemu je najskuplja stvar informacija,a ne znanje. najpametniji covjek na svijetu ispada ovca bez prave informacije;gledaj slucajnosti,do sada je pravih financijskih informacija "manjkalo". iluziju o slobodnom izboru danas pjevaju vec i vrapci na granama.

Prema tom argumentu ako bi se manjina (ili vecina) malo potrudila da postane naucena ovaj razgovor bi bio nepotreban. Covjek ne ispada "ovca"! Covjek se potrudi i pronade bitne informacije, ako zeli. Ako mu to nije zelja onda svjesno postaje "ovca", prema svom slobodnom izboru.

Nepotrebne ilustracije nisu substitucije za (i)logicni argument.

Covjek se potrudi i pronade bitne informacije,

igrom slucaja,informacije o kojima pricamo,a koje su tek nedavno izasle u javnost,bile su ( i jos su) najstroze cuvane tajne kroz stoljeca-DZABA BILO TRUDA ...
Denis Robert: he discovered how the clearing houses are laundering the illegal profits coming from seigniorage:04.09.2006:nakon zabranjene knjige,nakon prijetnje o skidanju s interneta brojeva bankovnih racuna,i jos bezbroj puno ozbiljnijih stvari,sada i malo suda:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7317/2529/1600/DDVw.jpg
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7317/2529/1600/DDV2w.jpg

ili jednostavno emisijska zarada, mada ima talenata koji su u stanju i izgubiti

DOBITAK NA PAPIRU (ECB),I GUBITAK U METALU(DRZAVE):

EURO TEST ZA JAVNOST :

1.zasto drzave umjesto da same stampaju novac,to prepustaju centralnim bankama ?

a)zato sto to ne mogu raditi
b)zato sto su privatni bankari vise posteni
c)zato sto je to "uobicajena navika" propisana zakonom

2.zasto drzave stampaju kovanice,a ne i papirnate novcanice ?

a)zato sto se to ne isplati
b)zbog ravnopravne podjele obaveza
c)zato sto tako propisuje Maastricht-sporazum

3.zasto drzave izdaje obveznice,umjesto da si stampaju vlastiti novac na kojega nebi trebalo placati kamate ?

a)zato sto se to vise isplati
b)racunovodstveno,tako je vise posteno
c)zato sto tako predvidjaju ugovori sa bankarima

4)zasto je tek 20.09.2005,nakon 112 godina od osnutka talijanske "narodne" banke
10.08.1893;javno objavljen spisak njenih vlasnika ?

a)zato sto nije bio dostupan noviji spisak
b)zato sto to nisu informacije za javnost
c)kako se ne bi otkrila privatna zarada na javnom

5)zasto su bankitalia i evropska centralna banka u privatnim rukama,cak i stranaca ?

a)zato sto je tako demokratski
b)to je efekt globalizacije
c)zato sto su drzave "prepustile" suverenost privatnim financijskim grupama

6)zasto novcanice vise nemaju zlatnu podlogu,odnosno nemaju nikakvu garanciju?

a)zato sto nema toliko zlata
b)zato sto se to ne isplati
c)zato sto je na taj nacin nixon 1971 izbjegao americki monetarni kolaps

7)sta je to monetarna suverenost ?

a)pravo centralne banke
b)pravo vlade
c)osnovno pravo svake drzave

A TRIBUTE TO EZRA POUND (1885-1972)-click
ezra pound : politicari nisu nista drugo nego konobari koji sluze bankare

u susret stampanju novog novca,centralna banda zatrazi od drzave duznicke papire (drzavne obveznice)u iznosu od naprimjer 100 kuna.
drzava ima potrebu za 100 kuna.centralna banda stampa 100 kuna u susret drzavnom obecanju za povrat tih 100 kuna + kamate.
sada zamislimo da u opticaju postoji samo tih 100 kuna;otkuda ce drzava platiti kamate kada za to nema postojeceg novca ? taj novac jednostavno ne postoji !!!
JEDINA MOGUCNOST:ZAMOLITI CENTRALNU BANDU DA STAMPA JOS NOVCA. ONA CE TO NARAVNO UCINITI,ALI SAMO UZ NOVO IZDAVANJE DRZAVNIH OBVEZNICA NA KOJE NARAVNO TREBA PLATITI NOVE KAMATE !!! KUZIS TRIK ?

STVORILI SU SISTEM GDJE JE NEMOGUCE ISPLATITI KAMATE,OSIM U SLUCAJU NOVOG ZADUZIVANJA,I STO JE JOS TEZE; TAJ BEZVRIJEDNI PAPIR SVAKE GODINE GUBI NA SVOJOJ VRIJEDNOSTI,A DRZAVA MORA ISPLACIVATI PRAVE VRIJEDNOSTI STVORENE RADOM,ZNOJEM I MUKOM NJENIH STANOVNIKA.

nazalost,prica ne zavrsava ovdje: drzava kao drzava ne proizvodi nista.
drzava je u stvari samo birokratska formalnost putem,koje centralna banda TRAZI SVAKE GODINE NOVE I SVE VECE POREZE OD STANOVNIKA I FIRMI.na taj se nacin,proporcionalno povecanju duga smanjuju ponuda i profesionalnost,malte ne svega postojeceg u zemlji.

u novije vrijeme,u mnogim slucajevima stampanje novca nije ni potrebno.
RADI SE O VIRTUALNIM BROJKAMA KOJE SE POJAVLJUJU SAMO NA EKRANIMA KOMPJUTERA.

NADAM SE DA STE RAZUMJELI,ZASTO SMO SVI SIROMASNIJI,AKO SLUCAJNO BDP NIJE U STALNOM-KONSTANTNOM VELIKOM-OGROMNOM PORASTU,ODNOSNO ZASTO MORAMO RADITI SVE VISE I VISE KAKO NE BI POSTALI SIROMASNI.

ako se osvrnete malo naokolo,vidjet cete sve vise i vise osoba koje sljakaju od jutra do mraka kako bi isplatile na vrijeme svoje dugove,racune,kazne,...
zar smo zbilja slobodni,ili smo postali novo roblje ?

ah,kada bi sve ovo znali vlasnici propalih firmi,obitelji gdje je nekad radio samo jedan clan-a danas ni dva nisu dosta.kada bi samo znali da su kucu koju su mukom,znojem
i velikim zrtvovanjem kupili,placati banci barem dva puta vise i to kroz cijeli zivot; a banci je bio dovoljan jedan jedini click-kao sto ce joj biti dovoljan jedan jedini click oduzeti vam kucu ako slucajno prestanete placati rate...ah,kad bi samo znali...

Hebry Ford je znao:
dobro je da stanovnistvo ne razumije nas bankarsko monetarni sistem,jer mislim da bi su suprotnom slucaju imali revoluciju prije sutrasnjeg dana

In describing the FED, McFadden remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:

"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the misadministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it".

United States Congressional Record - March 17, 1993 - Vol. #33, page H-1303 - Speaker- Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:

"Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's report that will lead to our demise."

On March 23, unnoticed by many, the US Federal Reserve quietly stopped publishing the quantum of broad money (referred to as M3) in the US economy.
Simply put, this meant the central bank will not reveal the amount of currency it pumps into the system each year. So, it will now be impossible to distinguish dollar inflows to US economy and new currency that the Fed would print.

Friday, December 30, 2005
Treasury Secretary John Snow:US Could Go Broke Next Year
“At that time, unless the debt limit is raised or the Treasury Department takes authorized extraordinary actions, we will be unable to continue to finance government operations,” Snow wrote.

A federal Reserve Note:



John F. Kennedy's United States Note:



President John F.Kennedy,The Federal Reserve And Executive Order 11110:
On June 4, 1963, a little known attempt was made to strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan money to the government at interest. On that day President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order No. 11110 that returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency, without going through the Federal Reserve.In all, Kennedy brought nearly $4.3 billion in U.S. notes into circulation.With the stroke of a pen, Mr. Kennedy was on his way to putting the Federal Reserve Bank of New York out of business.Executive Order 11110 could have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level, because it would have given the gevernment the ability to repay its debt without going to the Federal Reserve and being charged interest in order to create the new money.

Mr. Kennedy was assassinated just five months later.

fed je privatna korporacija,a dolar nije novac americkog naroda,vec obveza vracanja duga:



BANKROT / RODNI LISTOVI / DUG /BANKROT :

Since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence. All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated "warehouse receipts" for births and marriages in order to pledge us as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve's banks. The "Full faith and Credit" of the American people is said to be that which back the nation's debt. That simply means the American people's ability to labor and pay back that debt. In order to catalog its laborers, the government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end. Humans today are looked upon merely as resources - "human resources," that is.

"If you collect the money, you disperse the people;
If you disperse the money, you collect the people."
A Treatise on Monetary Reform

a banker is one who buys money and debts, creating other debts;
a banker is one who borrows money to lend it again at a profit
Ezra Pound, America, Roosevelt and the causes of the present war, Venice in 1944



"The Shocking Verifiable Truth about Banking and Loans"

Capitolo X di «Schiavi delle banche»

9-11 VIDEO: Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut

LINK TO EDUCATE YOURSELF AND YOUR KIDS

nafilovao si nas informacijama....... koje su "malo" u suprotnosti s gradivom iz monetarnih i javnih financija koje se kod nas uči.
je li ti to struka ili problematika koja te "private" zanima, kad već tako barataš pojmovima, podacima.........?

nafilovao si nas informacijama....... koje su "malo" u suprotnosti s gradivom iz monetarnih i javnih financija koje se kod nas uči.
je li ti to struka ili problematika koja te "private" zanima, kad već tako barataš pojmovima, podacima.........?

vjerovatno si primjetila da se nikoga ne sili i ne muci.
ovdje se izlazu informacije na uvid svima.
fora je u tome da svi slobodno donesu svoje zakljucke;to je uostalom i glavni razlog zbog cega radim ovo sto radim;ili ti prevedeno:
kao sto to rade oni drugi,puno jaci

PISMO PONIZENOG GRADJANINA ISTRE: -click



i ja se trudim ljudima pomoci da sto lakse dodju



do zakljucaka.
ovo je moje misljenje,i moj zakljucak;a ujedno je i najvazniji dio ove teme,te predstavlja tocku na i ; dakle:

Citat: › VIDEO ZAKLJUCAK : TKO JE UGASIO SVJETLO ? http://www.etleboro.com/it/video/who_shut_the_light1.swf http://www.etleboro.com/it/video/who_shut_the_light2.swf http://www.etleboro.com/it/video/who_shut_the_light3.swf "THE ROTHSCHILD FORMULA" This is the formula that banks act as if they use to generate perpetual interest payments from governments who are involved in perpetual war. 1. War is the ultimate discipline to any government. If it can successfully meet the challenge of war, it will survive. If it cannot, it will perish. All else is secondary. The sanctity of its laws, the prosperity of its citizens, and the solvency of it treasury will be quickly sacrificed by any government in its primal act of self-survival. 2. All that is necessary, therefore, to ensure that a government will maintain or expand its debt is to involve it in war or the threat of war. The greater the threat and the more destructive the war, the greater the need for debt. 3. To involve a country in war or the threat of war, it will be necessary for it to have enemies with credible military might. If such enemies already exist, all the better. If they exist but lack military strength, it will be necessary to provide them the money to build their war machine. If an enemy does not exist at all, then it will be necessary to create one by financing the rise of a hostile regime. 4. The ultimate obstacle is a government which declines to finance its wars through debt. Although this seldom happens, when it does, it will be necessary to encourage internal political opposition, insurrection, or revolution to replace that government with one that is more compliant to our will. The assassination of heads of state could play an important role in this process. 5. No nation can be allowed to remain militarily stronger than its adversaries, for that could lead to peace and a reduction of debt. To accomplish this balance of power, it may be necessary to finance both sides of the conflict. Unless one of the combatants is hostile to our interests and, therefore, must be destroyed, neither side should be allowed a decisive victory or defeat. While we must always proclaim the virtues of peace, the unspoken objective is perpetual war. Whether anyone actually put this strategy into words or passed it along from generation to generation is not important. In fact, it is doubtful it has ever worked that way. Whether it is the product of conscious planning or merely the consequence of men responding to the profit opportunities inherent in fiat money(1), the world's financial lords have acted as though they were following such a plan, and this has become especially apparent since the creation of the central-bank Mandrake Mechanism(2) three centuries ago. The "balance-of-power" question is particularly intriguing. Most history texts present the concept as though it were some kind of natural, social phenomenon which, somehow, has worked to the benefit of mankind. The implication is that it's just wonderful how, after all those European wars, no nation was strong enough to completely dominate the others. When the United States emerged from World War II with exactly such power, it was widely deplored, and massive political/financial mechanisms such as foreign aid and disarmament were set in motion to restore the balance. This has become almost a revered doctrine of international democracy. But the overlooked consequence of this sentimental notion is that wars "between equals" have become the permanent landscape of history."

pozdrav

pitanje glasi:
što osviješteni pojedinac (jedinka) može učiniti protiv sistema (kojeg je zapravo dio) u slučaju da je svjesna svega što si napisao?????????